On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 9:51:10 PM UTC-4, johny...@sigaint.org wrote:
> > Yeah, Joanna is seriously epic.
> Upon that, we can all agree.
> Everything she designs or writes up, seems bang-on (and wonderfully
> informative) in this increasingly security-threatened world we're living
> in.
> She's probably just a fictional character created by the NSA to mesmerize
> and lure us Linux geeks into this honeypot known as Qubes.  :)
> (Even I'm not quite that paranoid.  Yet, at least.)
> > How about Raspberry Pi..? That seems to have very few components.
> That's interesting.
> As a side project (one of soooo soooo many), I'm working on a
> Arduino-based system that will let me do secure, encrypted note-taking,
> email, SMS, messaging, etc., with (similarly secure/encrypted/hack-proof)
> mouse/keyboard/storage, as well as even being a platform for further
> development of the same system, without dependency upon a vulnerable PC or
> laptop.
> And also being lower-power and mobile, which helps security further.
> Things like secure and encrypted SMS, messaging, email, note taking,
> PDA-like functionality (on par with Palm Pilots in days of old) are
> certainly possible, without being threatened by hacks from all the
> organized (or disorganized) crooks or overly-aggressive governments
> pushing, unhindered and beyond reproach, way beyond constitutional and
> ethical boundaries.
> They will be portable, low power, low cost, open source, transparent tools
> that could be used by the oppressed, the abused, whistle-blowers, the
> relentlessly hacked, that are afraid to speak out, as well as the general
> public.
> I've been focused upon Arduino/atmega328 due to the low cost,
> accessibility, transparency, etc..
> (The harassment I've personally been undergoing has been keeping me, errr,
> rather "frugal," so the atmega328 platform is appealing.)
> Raspberry is a bit like Arduino/atmega on steroids.  I've not gone there
> because it draws more power, costs more; but at the end of the day, it's
> more powerful and probably has similar security/transparency as the
> Arduino/atmega328 if done properly.
> And with its additional processing power, it's a more likely candidate for
> replacing a PC for things like web browsing, Tor, VPN, PGP, (things a bit
> beyond atmega328's capabilities).  And in those cases, the extra cost is
> still far below even a basic notebook or tablet.
> (Not sure how it rates power-consumption-wise as compared to
> notebooks/tablets, maybe a bit worse.  I see it used a lot for home media
> PC's, which I doubt would last long on a couple of CR2032 batteries.  :) 
> But still way better than a PC, as long as we still can rely upon power to
> our homes, it'll do.  :) )
> I am firmly convinced that the only salvation to corrupt surveillance
> states and the take-over of the world by the greedy and corrupt, is a
> revolution to more simplistic, secure, and (especially) transparent
> technology that achieves a lot of the same things as today's hopelessly
> complex smartphones, Wifi,  broadbands, web browsers.
> I'll stop the rant now.  :)  But progressing/expanding up to the
> Raspberry's power while still achieving the same goals, is something I'm
> going to seriously ponder.
> (There are a number of other processors, like STM32 and others, that can
> similarly bring more processing power without blowing security.  My
> approach is quite portable, so any or all of the platforms should be
> viable to include in the solution.)
> Thanks for the inspiration.  :)
> JJ

I use a raspberry pi as a print server with a usb printer for my qubes machine. 
 Its great its just like running debian.  and chromium running on it for google 
loud print for android devices.  runs great.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to