On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 9:07:08 PM UTC-6, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
> It may make more sense to use qvm-block than qvm-usb here. Should in
> theory have a smaller attack surface and expose better-tested code
> paths.

I must be missing something really basic that, as a noob, I don't understand.
The command qvm-block -a Win7 dom0:sdb returns
ERROR: VM Win7 not running.

This seems like a catch 22 since I can't start the VM because there's no 
bootable file system yet nor can I attach a device to a not running VM.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/1984bc15-8a5c-419f-9121-ce077690a94f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to