On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:08 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01/16/2017 12:37 AM, Franz wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 09:17:32PM +0100, Maksymilian Skica wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Does anyone actually make Qubes OS working with some bitcoin hardware >>>> wallet? I want to buy one now and my first requirement is that it will >>>> work with Qubes. >>>> >>> Yes, it should work using qvm-usb. At least Trezor do work. >>> >>> >>> Also assigning to a Trezor-VM the USB controller of a USB expresscard >> dedicated to Trezor, it works perfectly. >> >> Best >> Fran >> >> - -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Marek Marczykowski-Górecki >>> Invisible Things Lab >>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >>> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v2 >>> >>> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYetLfAAoJENuP0xzK19csHIMH/ihx8tx2LUGlVgvUSptwa52h >>> Oor7Y/zeaDbeZzDsFCXwca2XVtfhm+idkqehmk6VamYeVRAeVg9iBYGlLWG4sC8M >>> hBsIiz4ZOWBqWokBSRFO72PZDqbwkz6E2cCuWXFanRkPrWfTNFGruf3OjYN52fCC >>> gCLpLWgsAMVEQH4OunrQJSDkBgcIfEobtDwFqxckdGVen/pos+C0sI0DBO8WVQiK >>> y3rw7MRp5X0brRycbVJ531TRsFVK+nZCcFdO4x/aSQDaXIQlm+RfxR6VQQzIjC+c >>> qP3vxy1IbNOGQYPmhQTVIU0BHysT6cJBt58GdUEiLz3u7RYCjMuQvjXPYnfE+P8= >>> =8Z0H >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "qubes-users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ >>> msgid/qubes-users/20170115013942.GB3974%40mail-itl. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> Am I the only one who thinks it is a horrible idea to use a closed > source hardware device designed by a bunch of kids and probably made in > china to manage lots of money? > > Hardware crypto sucks because it can't be verified without a team of PhD's > and millions of dollars in equipment. > Well, every way has its own problems. We have seen that even using a cold VM with Qubes may fail because of a Xen bug, so the most reasonable with money is to share the risk among different and independent routes, so if one fails you'll not loose everything. So Trezor may well be one of them. That said, isn't this https://github.com/trezor/ some indication that we may trust Trezor a little bit? Best Fran -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/CAPzH-qCrEJGb5MqDV1tuwjpemPuf8202Eji81g4YJYie5w0jow%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
