On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 5:07 AM, evo <evolut...@aliaks.de> wrote:

>
>
> Am 17.03.2017 um 01:19 schrieb Franz:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:01 AM, evo <evolut...@aliaks.de
> > <mailto:evolut...@aliaks.de>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >     Am 15.03.2017 um 23:45 schrieb Andrew David Wong:
> >     > On 2017-03-15 01:14, evo wrote:
> >     >> Am 15.03.2017 um 01:17 schrieb Unman:
> >     >>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 08:02:58PM -0400, Chris Laprise wrote:
> >     >>>> On 03/14/2017 01:55 PM, evo wrote:
> >     >>>>> hmm.. this is also a good point, thanks! so if i do not use
> >     >>>>> openoffice in my bankingVM, there is no practical
> >     >>>>> vulnerability in it.
> >     >>>>>
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> Yes and no. Off the top of my head, there are two things to be
> >     >>>>  concerned about with the (regular, distro) software you
> >     >>>> install:
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> 1. Does it cause an additional service to start accepting
> >     >>>> connections?
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> 2. Does it have a MIMEtype or similar mapping, so that clicking
> >     >>>> on a mislabeled file could cause it to open in an
> >     >>>> unwanted/risky app. Unfortunately, nautilus doesn't seem to
> >     >>>> have a setting for always asking before starting an app. But
> >     >>>> at least it defaults to double-click instead of single-click.
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> 3. Installing some programs, like libre/openoffice, brings with
> >     >>> it numerous libraries and attendant programs which may widen the
> >     >>>  attack surface of your qube considerably.
> >     >>>
> >     >
> >     >> so its better to have such VMs as banking or email in
> >     >> standalone-mode.
> >     >
> >     > No, that doesn't follow. See my previous message about having
> multiple
> >     > TemplateVMs.
> >     >
> >     >> The thing is... as i understood, stanalone-machines (if they are
> >     >> not HVM) have all software from the template they use. So the only
> >     >> way is, to install new iso on HVM, isn't it?
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > This doesn't follow either. StandaloneVMs and HVMs are completely
> >     > independent of one another. It's possible that there is
> terminological
> >     > confusion here. Please consult the glossary:
> >     >
> >     > https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/glossary/
> >     <https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/glossary/>
> >     >
> >     >> in that case, i don't really understand the sense of standalone
> >     >> AppVMs.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > StandaloneVMs can be useful for many different things, but not
> every
> >     > user will have a need for them. For example, if you have a piece of
> >     > software that installs parts of itself in both the root fs and
> >     user dirs
> >     > (and you don't want to work around this with bind-dirs), and you
> need
> >     > the software in only one VM, then a StandaloneVM is probably a
> perfect
> >     > solution.
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> > Evo, let me oversimplify it
> >
> >     so is it better to have more template-VMs?
> >
> >
> > yes
> >
> >     But why not standalone as a copy of the existing template-VM?
> >
> >
> > you do not need standalone VMs. StandaloneVMs are only for special
> > cases/software, but since you do not mention any special case forget
> > them as well as HVMs.
> >
> >
> >     After that i can delete all software i dont need on it and have
> rather
> >     clean VM with just the software i need.
> >
> >
> > you can do the same with templates
> >
> >
> >     the other thing is, on standalone-vm i can see existing updates just
> in
> >     time... VM that works on general template dont show updates, for this
> >     case i must start the template vm. So if i do not start template for
> a
> >     long time, i will have insecure appvms. Or do i understand something
> >     wrong?
> >
> >
> > Evo, just start the templates every time Qubes-manager show than an
> > update is available, with the green downward arrow, that is every few
> > days. Then reboot your computer. Updating only a couple of templates
> > you'll automatically update and somehow clean all of yours VMs, that in
> > my case are 38. You'll probably have only a few of them, but with time
> > you'll learn how convenient it is to create template depending light VMs
> > for special purposes. But imagine having a lot of standaloneVMs each one
> > needing an independent update.
> > best
> > Fran
> >
>
> hmmm, ok
> you won :)
>
> i just thought, its crude to create 3 different template-VMs for vault,
> e-mail and banking.
>
> after using Qubes for some time, i understand the possibility to have 38
> VMs
>
> so the appVM (based on template) will show me also the green arrow of
> update?


No, because the appVM does not need an update. Only the template does need
it.

> i thought, it is just visible, if you start the template-VM.
>

No, the green arrow is visible on the side of the template even if the
template is kept always closed

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/CAPzH-qD8dabK8OT4MXD%3DyBuEvqqV2sCpE2nKTCS1gjWEDGc3ng%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to