On 05/20/2017 01:51 PM, Vít Šesták wrote: >> I am wondering if Haswell and newer is more tightly >> bound to the Intel ME to the point where those machines actually need >> the driver enabled to work correctly. I don't think that's the case, but >> a sanity check would be useful. > It it just about testing if everything works well, or should I try to look at > something specific? > > Regards, > Vít Šesták 'v6ak'
Mostly right now, I'm concerned about regressions in hardware support; the hardware I have access to test on is limited (Sandy Bridge, Westmere, and a Core 2 Quad Q6600) so while things work fine for me (I've actually moved on to 4.11 in dom0 now since the Hardened Kernel Community Project is working hard to port grsecurity features to that tree and have made patches available), I don't know if this kernel will work fine for others as is. In regards to the ME, in addition to Intel hardware support working properly, I suppose I'm curious if the machine will run longer than 30 minutes without the ME driver (although maybe that's just a Windows thing; I don't know). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/ofq6vm%24p9i%241%40blaine.gmane.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
