On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 11:59:19 AM UTC-4, yura...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 3:50:18 PM UTC, cooloutac wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 11:31:27 AM UTC-4, PR wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I think it makes sense to concentrate more on what we (different user 
> > > types/groups) would like to see, instead of having some kind of 'flame 
> > > war' GUI vs. Terminal.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The good thing was always that you can built very complicated workflows 
> > > using  the terminal/bash scrips make life easier and that you can have a 
> > > GUI for 80% of the standard tasks for "normal users", which are more 
> > > interested in using their computer as a tool instead of tweaking around.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > We can and should have both:
> > > 1) API/terminal commands for 'advanced users' and
> > > 2) a simple GUI for normal users who just want to use a PC that protects 
> > > their privacy somewhat better than their current Windows 10 Laptop.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Am 05.08.2017 5:02 nachm. schrieb "cooloutac" <raah...@gmail.com>:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The forever problem of linux,  is the self fulfilling prophecies from 
> > > people who want to feel superior over others. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Disagree, I think that those people are just faster using the terminal.
> > > And those users are technically skilled and have at least basic knowledge 
> > > about an operating system.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I agree with cooloutac that Qubes has a benefit if it can be used for 
> > > regular tasks without touching the terminal.
> > > Even when using Windows lots of people use Laptops that have been setup 
> > > by experienced users and then handover to them.
> > > They don't bother with tweaking the system, so simplifying the use of 
> > > Qubes would help to get those users on board.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > BUT:
> > > Important point is that additional security/privacy has most time a price 
> > > that it add a small layer of complexity/less usability for the user.
> > > But Qubes is doing a great job to reduce this overhead.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > As far as I have understand the Qubes team statement, it seems that the 
> > > concentrate more on the Qubes Core stuff and having the API/Terminal 
> > > commands, someone can still write a GUI for Qubes like Qubes Manager.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Honestly I don't understand why it is that hard to Port Qubes Manager 
> > > over to Qubes 4, so that the user can choose:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > - terminal 
> > > - old Qubes manager with maybe a reduced feature set
> > > - new Qubes widgets
> > > - ... ?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This topic reminds me about the vi vs. emacs discussions. What the heck? 
> > > I use both ;-)
> > > Or the new "Ribbon Bar" from Microsoft which was also not that accepted 
> > > in the beginning.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > - PhR
> > 
> > there is no versus anything, noone is asking to get rid of the terminal?
> > 
> > This is nothing like vi vs emac discussions.   what?
> 
> hmm, I think he was referring to the earlier posts far up above, and not you 
> specifically. 
> But he makes a good point in that matter, both are important if we want to 
> find motivation and resources to make systems that not only reach the 
> advanced users, but also reaching the everyday users.
> One cannot afford not to take the other seriously, both need each others in 
> modern PC systems, especially if we want to survive the next big thing, the 
> next platform coming after smartphones, which is partially already happening 
> right now. There won't be a laptop, desktop or tablet for Linux to live on, 
> if we don't take emerging technologies seriously. The time to stand together 
> is now, and making whole systems that take in both the advanced and everyday 
> users, would be a game changer.

By not taking secure boot seriously you are creating that self fulfilling 
prophecy.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/f4b45946-632e-4051-86a8-9a12c09d7834%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to