On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 03:15:30PM -0300, Franz wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Unman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 02:37:49PM -0300, Franz wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Chris Laprise <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 12/09/2017 09:56 AM, Franz wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I bought a larger SSD and want to reinstall 3.2, but gpg verification
> > no
> > > >> more works.
> > > >>
> > > >> I have a gpg VM where all this verificaion stuff is already installed
> > and
> > > >> worked for 3.1 and 3.2 in the past, so assumed it should work again
> > for the
> > > >> same task, but no.
> > > >>
> > > >> For the signature file of the iso, I pasted it into a file called
> > > >> Qubes-R3.2-x86_64.iso.asc
> > > >>
> > > >> But I get:
> > > >>
> > > >> gpg -v --verify Qubes-R3.2-x86_64.iso.asc Qubes-R3.2-x86_64.iso
> > > >> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > > >> gpg: the signature could not be verified.
> > > >>
> > > >> So I suspected it is because developer key lapse after one year and
> > did:
> > > >> |gpg --recv-keys 0xC52261BE0A823221D94CA1D1CB11CA1D03FA5082 |
> > > >> |as instructed here https://www.qubes-os.org/secur
> > > >> ity/verifying-signatures/ It actually imported one key, but
> > verification
> > > >> gives the same failed result. |
> > > >> |Also tried to import the key associated to iso download [user@gpg
> > > >> iso2]$ gpg --import qubes-release-3-signing-key\(1\).asc gpg: key
> > > >> 03FA5082: "Qubes OS Release 3 Signing Key" not changed gpg: Total
> > number
> > > >> processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 |
> > > >> |Finally downloaded the iso again, but same result |
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Maybe you pasted the key into the .asc file, instead of pasting the
> > > > signature?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > this one:
> > >
> > > Version: GnuPG v2
> > >
> > > iQIcBAABCAAGBQJX4XLxAAoJEMsRyh0D+lCC738P/R35gthUmjr35NqF3foatmF/
> > > UIZ0ggKBXUqlMNaTdl4TosJsExuZw6/YDErgukupHAhPaV22WcBtz+6+ZL6VdmSz
> > > /UpBOVxQ2SBFzj7DfVelpWOCp+wp09xf42fxqXvhpZQyj8plbgjJ1glbkd5uM6Dp
> > > vDZJWYwxtTujqLxyX2WBSvBWgtpCrhCMYFZHbAHhICQ3iWxr6sPgQhXEh49FuRZU
> > > Ksk9OZJmgrQ3ds5hO3HGuSQYUQKEuNlWbTN7dJJQHbPpvS6areaWCIKuIy6M2HwL
> > > zP6TbTF+B3F1Se+AwhiSb4rKQgVecgd+lxXc+KqmfNQfIJf/2lK2KxqmWY5O9Idz
> > > mtp1w0o8hnJlS6Axn3JAmmipNuCPUVg+a99KV4TL01xbAc35eUkCQi12IwDCiO8Q
> > > m0CaFy0xbBImCb2qFt8MNk+qbcIxFI0kML0IwJ4axSdDIrMiLl96Rvso8vEcyuAg
> > > CS3SjRxorbltjtb/5CmyMRdSpXzCJ4fY2U8vmqMijtKQCmCs6xJKsexsC/gNaXVO
> > > ZoIsMwBwu1a/SThx1zUT4Iq0gyN1P0IxwKIrd2GT+ewBlwo3DfEMaPItYduVqGE2
> > > OGjcxx2J/F7Zn6DH2QSx6o1W25hUNjtRSsWv8udtOK602wjX9AjotRUl5LWriq/P
> > > 8sabLZSQ2AWu4Gr1qXAy
> > > =qkEl
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > If you think the .iso downloaded incorrectly, first thing to check is
> > the
> > > > exact number of bytes with 'ls -l' in case the download stopped
> > prematurely.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I downloaded it two times...
> > >
> > > [user@gpg iso2]$ ls -l
> > > total 4147212
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 user user 4246732800 Dec  9 00:07 Qubes-R3.2-x86_64.iso
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user        761 Dec  9 10:26 Qubes-R3.2-x86_64.iso.asc
> > > -rw-r--r-- 1 user user       2364 Dec  9 10:41
> > > 'qubes-release-3-signing-key(1).asc'
> > >
> >
> > That's the right signature - try downloading rather than
> > copying/pasting.
> >
> 
> Downloading? You do not know how many times I tried to find a link to
> download a file... It is two days trying that.
> 
> But if Unman tells to download it there should be a way. So tried "save
> link as" and it actually download the file and it worked and verified the
> iso correctly.
> 
> Well but how it is that if I click on PGP key it actually downloades a
> file, while if click on Signature it opens it? This make things
> unnecessarily complex. Clicking on Signature should download a file as
> well. Don'you you think so?
> 
> 
> > Have you included the BEGIN/END lines?
> >
> 
> no, probably that was my error
> 
> Anyway many thank Unman and Chris for being always willing to help
> 
> Best
> Fran

The reason for the different treatment is that your browser recognises
the signature as plain text and displays it, but identifies the key as a
detached signature (!!), which it offers to download - note that it is
probably identified as text and you will be offered the option to open
it in a text editor.
Browser handling of different file types is quite interesting.
In this case I suspect that the difference in Version numbers on the
key and signature makes the difference.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/20171209183859.v56nb7pof3xhrfzx%40thirdeyesecurity.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to