On 08/21/2018 11:39 AM, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > SGX is another ME service slash intel marketing gimmick invented for DRM > not security. > > If the person who purchased the computer can't examine the VM's running > on it then they are not owning it simply licensing it which is why SGX > is a bad technology and people shouldn't buy x86. Consider you want to deploy your things in the cloud, eg. because it's less expensive. Then I guess you would actually like to not have to trust the cloud provider :)
You still have to trust Intel for actually doing what they promise, but you have to trust the processor manufacturer at some point anyway. Not saying SGX actually meets its promises, though, just reacting to your second paragraph. There are use cases for having the person who owns a computer not being able to examine VM's running on it. Whether you want or not to use or have them is a different question. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/b3d6a5d2-215b-ac7e-28b5-d50b01ff77b3%40leo.gaspard.ninja. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
