On Friday, February 8, 2019 at 10:24:17 AM UTC-5, Laszlo Zrubecz wrote: > On 2/8/19 3:55 PM, brendan wrote: > > Anyway. The open source OpenXT (open source based on the above) > > is/was designed for the use case discussed in this thread and is > > the underlying platform of DoD's SecureView environment. > > That means total control over the workstaion. > vs. > The initial goal: > "The system administrators would not have to support QubesOS, just the > Windows VM"
Yeah, I don't think you really can do that without sys admin control of the workstation itself...well, not without Intel SGX that works, I suppose. But your point is taken, my proposal does not meet the criteria...though I don't believe anything available can meet that criteria. :) > This kind of total (enterprise) control was planned for qubes 4.x - > however I don't hear about real life usage. Yeah, I recall reading about that. Thanks, Brendan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/eba2c380-8185-4365-8284-6bfe16f98530%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
