On Saturday, May 25, 2019 at 8:50:57 PM UTC-4, unman wrote: > Docs also say that where a thin pool is used primarily for thin > provisioning a larger value is optional.
Did you mean to say "optimal" or did the docs really say that larger cluster sizes are optional? In any case, I think the docs I read had a bit of a hedge: they stated a larger value is better for performance, but a smaller value may be better for heavy COW usage. > This isnt a Qubes choice - it's Fedora, (and, I think, dependent on the > size of the pool.) Sure. Sounds like a lot of folks around here want to get out from under the thumb of Big Red. :P Brendan PS - opened three new issues... #5053 - Qubes Disk Widget - please inform about/alert on pool metadata space #5054 - LVM Pool metadata default size is too small #5055 - Add fstrim on shutdown of templates and template-based VMs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/26ac4263-4508-48d0-9f7e-940631061349%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
