On 10/26/20 3:24 AM, 'J.M. Porup' via qubes-users wrote:
#This email represents my analysis of the events of the last few weeks.
#It does not reflect the views of the Qubes Project or Qubes developers
#in any way.
My Qubes laptop got hacked by Five Eyes because they thought I was a
terrorist, when in fact I was only making clown videos.
That is surely one of the strangest sentences I have ever had to write,
so let me establish my bona fides. I'm a cybersecurity reporter ,
and have covered cybersecurity and national security since 2013. I have
a masters degree in cybersecurity from Berkeley, and am currently working
on my OSCP. I've been using Qubes as my daily laptop since 2014. I'm not
a Qubes developer, but I would consider myself an advanced user.
I'm also a clown. (I gave a talk at Hackers on Planet Earth this year
called "Cybersecurity and Clown" ). In fact, when Covid hit I was in
France studying clown with Philippe Gaulier, the same clown master who
trained Sacha Baron Cohen. I'm a standup comedian and comic actor as well.
So when I made these incredibly silly clown videos , I didn't expect to find
myself under intense physical surveillance for several weeks. I mean, intense.
I've been under physical surveillance before for national security reporting
I've done (like this article ), but this was the closest I've ever seen the
security services here in Canada swing their elbows.
Knowing that physical surveillance is always accompanied by electronic
surveillance, I kept an eye on my devices. My phone got popped first. Zero-click
iPhone RCE. Two missed calls from a non-existent number right when the physical
But would they risk a Qubes 0-day to go after me--for being a literal fscking
They did, and per their new "flyswatter policy" left a JTRIG-style goodbye
present when they finally realized I'm just a journalist, and a clown.
One morning last week, I launched a disposable Debian 10 template with my preset
defaults of no netvm and a blank page preset--but instead a default page of
"https://www.youtube.com/" appeared. It only happened once, but it was enough.
As you are a specialist (more than I am), do you think your computer was
attacked offline (breaking the LUKS encryption), or do you think it was
Does this rise to the standard of journalist proof I'm accustomed to? Of course
not. Would I risk my reputation by writing this email to the qubes-users list
if I was not confident in my assessment? What do you think?
So why am I writing this message? First, and most importantly, there is clearly
a great Qubes 0-day floating around that needs to be found and squashed. But
if Five Eyes are prepared to risk a Qubes 0-day on a clown, who would they *not*
risk it on? There must be dozens, if not hundreds, of active Qubes implants out
there right now.
And this email is meant to burn those implants and make them go dark. If you
Five Eyes in your threat model, then you need to assume compromise and do
you need to do. Now.
Does this mean I'm going to stop using Qubes? No. Of course not. Qubes is still
our best hope for a reasonably secure laptop. Nothing I've said in this email
changes that big picture analysis.
p.s. And yo, guys? Cause I know you're reading this. Next time you decide to
dishonor your oath to protect the Constitution, you might read the First
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To view this discussion on the web visit