On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 5:49 PM Floyd <fl...@bauernhof.us> wrote: > On 1/18/22 7:09 AM, 'Rune Philosof' via qubes-users wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 1:24 PM 'awokd' via qubes-users < > qubes-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> 'Rune Philosof' via qubes-users: >> > Why not use fedora 35 for dom0? >> > Wouldn't it make it easier to maintain, while also getting better >> hardware >> > support? >> > >> https://www.qubes-os.org/faq/#why-is-dom0-so-old >> > > Security is the core of Qubes, not convenience or bells and whistles. > There are, generally speaking, fewer surprises with mature versions. > > There was a saying in IT of which I often reminded my employees and > colleagues - I don't mind being on the bleeding edge, as long as it's not > the client's blood. Update that to today's reality - I don't mind being on > the bleeding edge, as long as it's not my blood. >
Those are good arguments. However, I am testing out 4.1 and looking a bit into the cause of the bugs I see (loading the coredumps in gdb). I find my motivation for using time on getting to the bottom of the errors dropping because there is a chance that the errors are already fixed in newer versions. How hard it would be for me to test it out on newer versions, I wonder. It would be nice if Qubes was something you could add to an existing installation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/CAL8J5gaxndr1MqGNBmNKaSUjeJYmVxKi6k_zekka65geEaKbbg%40mail.gmail.com.
