On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 11:39:18AM +0000, Stickstoff wrote: > In the end I gavce up on my own backup script with > $ qvm-block attach > and will try to adapt wyng as a backup tool [1].
As I regularly say, I dont see that Wyng provides features that most users expect from a backup/restore tool. Want to find a file that you deleted some time in the last month or year? Restore EVERY backup that you took, and look through the volumes til you find it. Want to find a specific version of that file you were working on? Again, restore EVERY Wyng backup and check until you find it. Note that if you have also added a large quantity of other data in the meantime you have to restore ALL that data until you find the one file you are looking for. No doubt the Qubes Backup, and Wyng serve a specific use case. It's just that in my experience it isnt what most users want from their backups. dd'ing a disk is undoubtedly a good way of preserving data. But it doesnt serve most people's expectations of a backup/restore process. Qubes Backup and Wyng - the same. You should be aware of these limitations and be happy to work with them: otherwise, put another backup regime in place that WILL serve your needs. > I'm still unsure how to feel about 300k+ files per backup (for 50GB), but it > works for having *any* backup at least. I'm appalled at the prospect. -- I never presume to speak for the Qubes team. When I comment in the mailing lists I speak for myself. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/aPjGc_QJUxQw9FXE%40thirdeyesecurity.org.
