At 4:09 PM -0400 2005-09-25, Steve Kostecke wrote:
The easiest solution, assuming that the WG folks are interested in
updating the definitions is to let them update the list in place
(without going through the webmaster "choke-point").
I'm perfectly fine with that.
Or we could clone the existing definition list to the IETF Web. Once
they've completed updating the list we can copy it back to where it
belongs.
Or move it there and just point to it, and not have to worry
about copying it back. That is, assuming that the IETF Web is public.
I'm perfectly fine with either solution. IMO, the less work we
have to do and the more work we can let them do without needing our
intervention, the better.
Do you have a preference?
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
