"Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> But unless you're involved in the actual fixing of the bug, there's no
> point in your pontificating on what should or should not be done. Work
> with Danny to get this issue resolved, or at least let him be the one to
> say what is or is not going to happen. If you disagree with the way he
> says that things will be done, then you would have a valid point to
> discuss.
I tried that in 2001.
> Until then, this is all a pointless tempest in a teapot, created by a
> bunch of people who can yammer on all night long, but who otherwise have
> no involvement in the actual fixing of the bug.
I offered to fix it back in 2001. However, what I got was that a fix
would only be accepted if it was a complete redesign, and nobody could agree
on what the new design should be.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/msg/e11bda39290d2ef9?hl=en&;
DS
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
