Brad,

I do not understand your definition. Could you expand a little on that
subject? What kind of events are you refereing to?

--

    Björn


[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brad Knowles) writes:

> At 4:53 PM +0000 2005-09-29, John Pettitt wrote:
> 
> >  I don't agree with Brad that 10ms is as good as it gets,
> 
>       If your HZ= setting is 100, then 10ms is, by definition, as
> good as it gets.  At least, when it comes to measuring short-term
> single event clock timing matters.
> 
>       When it comes to measuring your long-term average accuracy,
> you may be able to get better than that.
> 
> -- 
> Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
> temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
> 
>      -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
>      Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
> 
>    SAGE member since 1995.  See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
> _______________________________________________
> questions mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to