John Pettitt wrote: > Ralf Gross wrote: >> Martin Burnicki: >> >> >>>Let's see the capture output first. Then we'll see whether we must have >>>a look at the driver. >> >> >> Here's the result. >> >> 292:23:59:59 >> 292:23:59:60 >> 293:00:00:00 > > > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 59:60 !!!!!!!
DOH! I overlooked that :( >> 293:00:00:01 > >> I only noticed a gap between second 21 and 23. >> > I think the 59:60 is more the cause of the problem! That should only > happen when there is a leap second. Ok, does this mean the NTS-100-GPS FW is buggy? Should I ignore the peak, because it will hopefully disappear after 12/31/2005? Ralf _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
