David L. Mills wrote: > Danny, > > What I am conderned about is the version and OS of the server, which is > revealed in the rv response. The version of ntpq is for most purposes > irrelevant. > > Dave
Results from # ntpq -c rv on both servers Terrance status=06f4 leap_none, sync_ntp, 15 events, event_peer/strat_chg, processor="alpha", system="OSF1V5.1", leap=00, stratum=5, precision=-11, rootdelay=0.009, rootdispersion=46.470, peer=52053, refid=phillip, reftime=c70850aa.25db22d0 Tue, Oct 25 2005 16:35:22.147, poll=10, clock=c7085154.921deacc Tue, Oct 25 2005 16:38:12.570, state=4, phase=-0.135, frequency=-5.450, jitter=0.172, stability=0.000 Phillip status=05f4 leap_none, sync_local_proto, 15 events, event_peer/strat_chg, processor="alpha", system="OSF1V5.1", leap=00, stratum=4, precision=-11, rootdelay=0.000, rootdispersion=12.402, peer=44260, refid=LOCAL(1), reftime=c7085117.2608aefb Tue, Oct 25 2005 16:37:11.148, poll=10, clock=c7085139.8871a3b1 Tue, Oct 25 2005 16:37:45.532, state=4, phase=0.000, frequency=-10.252, jitter=0.000, stability=0.000 _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
