Martin Burnicki wrote: > Dave, > > David L. Mills wrote: > > >>It may in fact be easier to have a separate process whose only mission >>to step the clock back one second at a designated time and activated by >>a cron job or whatever the equivalent in Windows. Don't do a slew at >>this point; that would drive the NTP clock discipline nuts. > > > The leap second is an exception, so it should be handled as an exception. If > an additional offset is applied in adj_host_clock() for a specific > interval, just to account for the leap second, then the variables of the > clock discipline algorithm should not be touched at all. >
That sounds like a reasonable proposal. I don't like Dave's suggestion of a separate process doing anything to the clock, I'd rather keep it all in one place. Danny > > Martin _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
