Damion de Soto wrote: > David L. Mills wrote: >> Damion, >> >> Please don't copy my presonal mailbox with postings to this list. I >> routinely throw them away without reading. > sorry. > >> See ntp-dev/libntp/systime.c line 85. > ahh, this is only the beta and dev versions. > I've been playing with the 4.2.0 production version and sometimes I get > fuzz, sometimes I don't - so i guess it's just magic CPU fuzz. > > > Using 4.2.0b and manually forcing HAVE_CLOCK_GETTIME off gives me the > correct randomization of the low bits. > > Which then takes us back to the semi-original problem. > > Should the ntp_random() function be applied to the result of > clock_gettime() and getclock() ? > > In my situation I would say yes - I can't see why it shouldn't always > fuzz it. > > Do any of the developers read this group, or should I submit a bug/patch > some other way? > Of course we do. If you think you have a bug and/or fix, please submit it. We can always decide later if it really is a bug or enhancement. Make sure you check it against the latest development release.
Danny _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
