"Harlan Stenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's talking about using burst on a refclock. The problem is that
this is a
logical extension of the purpose of burst to a realm where it has
not been
implemented. There is no "downside" as one will cause no extra
traffic; the
intente would be to "listen to more frequent answers".
For some refclocks this make sense (as they may provide timestamps
once per
second), and I believe Dave has done some work on handling this case
for
some refclocks.
H
I tried it, and I can't observe any change on the ACTS refclock. I
still only get one time stamp line logged in clockstats per call.
Joshua Coombs
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
