Daniel Kabs wrote: > ega wrote: >> this might be due to bug 571, see >> https://ntp.isc.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=571 >> which was introduced in ntp-dev-4.2.0b-20060123 ... > > I think this bug does not apply in this case for two reasong: > First, I am using "ntpdate [EMAIL PROTECTED]:4.2.0a+stable-2-r". > Second, ntpdate is correct in refusing to sync from an unsync'd clock. > > Cheers > Daniel
The particular bug report has a correct fix for a different issue and needs to get fix. Peter's bug fix in the attachment is correct for rc1, though not for yours. Danny _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
