>> Hmm, might be worth having a 4.2.1-RC2 ? > >We already have patched tarball snapshots - what do you see as the benefit >of an RC2?
I see it as a naming issue. RC1 seems like the first release candidate. I'd expect the next one to be RC2. Then RC3... as needed. You have been bumping the date code as new tarballs get created. That's fine, I think, just different. (I assume that's piggybacking on some normal nightly release scripts.) It would probably be less confusing for me if the "1" were dropped. Thus 4.2.1-RC-whenever would indicate that you have switched to release candidate mode and the whenever part would tell me which version/candidate it was. -- The suespammers.org mail server is located in California. So are all my other mailboxes. Please do not send unsolicited bulk e-mail or unsolicited commercial e-mail to my suespammers.org address or any of my other addresses. These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
