Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 06:29:14 +0000, David J Taylor wrote: > >> .. although only if you use one particular, rather illogical, day >> numbering convention where the significance order is mixed up >> throughout the date string. Using a more logical convention, where >> significance increases uniformly, you still have a month to go. > > 60/61, 60, 60, 24, 28/30/31, 365/366: real uniform there :-D > > I'll take ISO 8601 as the one, true date format, please. I don't > claim its uniform, just unambiguous.
Please re-read my post - I claimed the /significance/ increased uniformly: second, minute, hour, day, month, year Each item has more significance than the item to the left, as opposed to: second, minute, hour, month, day, year where every item /except/ day is in order of increasing significance. David _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
