Ronan Flood wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 09:21:22 +0200, > "Maarten Wiltink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> "Hal Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> Suppose I had something like a Rubidium oscillator that makes >>> a nice PPS signal, but it's not synchronized to a second boundary. >>> >>> Is there any way to take advantage of that? >> If I've understood past news correctly, you can connect it as a >> PPS source and, once you have an idea of its offset, tinker/fudge >> it so it does appear synchronised to the second boundary. >> >> The bad news is that my recollection of said past news is also that >> this didn't quite work then. I think the offset correction was >> applied at the wrong point, so it still appeared off-beat. But >> perhaps that got fixed in the meantime. > > I hope so, as that's how we're planning to hook-up a Rubidium oscillator, > using refclock_atom! Without kernel/hardpps, i.e. flag3=0. > > Note that we expect to have to alter the fudge regularly to track Rb aging. >
It should work - it's the flag3 = 1 mode thats broken. John _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
