Felix Tilley wrote: > On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 02:54:39 +0000, Danny Mayer wrote: > > >> NTP has never used TCP. >> >> Where did you see that this system has public access? The notice >> attached to the list for tick (time is a CNAME) shows the following: >> >> AccessDetails: Open access to stratum-2 servers and to UCLA clients. >> >> So why are you trying to access it? >> >> Danny > > It uses ntpdate -ub. I am on a dialup. No broadband here. > I didn't mean to cause so much trouble here. I will wait until > the holiday is over, and contact ucla.edu. >
Don't bother, you have no right to use it. Please desist and use something else like the pool. > I thank all of you for your help. > > syncmyclock > > Last syncmyclock update Mon, 04 Sep 2006 11:29:28 -0700 > > time.arizona.edu > 4 Sep 12:48:12 ntpdate[4254]: step time server 128.196.128.234 offset > 0.174213 sec > ntp0.cornell.edu > 4 Sep 12:48:14 ntpdate[4255]: step time server 132.236.56.250 offset > -0.004097 sec > time.caltech.edu > 4 Sep 12:48:16 ntpdate[4256]: step time server 192.12.19.20 offset 0.002223 > sec > time.ucla.edu > 4 Sep 12:48:20 ntpdate[4257]: no server suitable for synchronization found > ntp2.usno.navy.mil > 4 Sep 12:48:22 ntpdate[4258]: step time server 192.5.41.209 offset 0.000743 > sec > tick.usno.navy.mil > 4 Sep 12:48:25 ntpdate[4259]: step time server 192.5.41.40 offset 0.002183 > sec > Synching Hardware Clock to System Clock > I have no interest in reviewing your list to see if any of them have access restrictions but you should be using the pool and not stratum 1 or 2 servers. You are ignoring the Rules of Engagement. Under no circumstances should you be using Stratum 1 servers for this. Danny _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
