>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Maarten Wiltink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> writes:
Maarten> [...] >> OpenBSD's OpenNTP was, as I recall (and IMO), originally a malignantly >> broken SNTP implementation. Maarten> Malignantly, no less? Come off it. Sure, they made mistakes, but Maarten> that wasn't the intent. I'm not suggesting their intent was malignant, I'm saying that IMO they released a malignantly broken SNTP implementation. It advertised itself as an S2 server. The time on the machine was not disciplined. This behavior is, IMO, malignant. Do we need to go further here? H _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
