"Richard B. Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan Ceuleers wrote: >> Danny Mayer wrote:
>>> I don't know why you are asking about Tardis here. We don't know >>> anything about it. >> >> Probably because this is comp.protocols.time.ntp, not comp.apps.ntpd. >> >> I know that this does not change the reality of the situation, but if >> we collectively stopped discouraging non-ntpd but NTP-related subjects >> here then perhaps this group could in time live up to its name. > > If you look at the traffic here, maybe one percent is about the > protocol. Ninety percent is about how to use, configure, troubleshoot, > etc, the reference implementation. I could argue that the group is > misnamed! > > Perhaps we should also support Open NTP, W32TIME, etc? Nobody can force 'us'. But OpenNTP folks might drop in and answer questions about it, and personally I would welcome them. > It looks as if Tardis is a commercial product. As such, it should > have its own technical support. This is a valid but orthogonal point. Incidentally, w32time is also part of a commercial product. Technical support for commercial products might _also_ drop in and answer questions about them, and the nice folks from Meinberg for example _are_ being welcomed here. Groetjes, Maarten Wiltink _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
