On 2007-02-03, Uwe Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Woolley wrote: >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> >> Make sure that you aren't really running ntpd as some vendors have >> a weird idea that misnaming ntpd confuses people less; it certainly > > This happened by way of LSB (http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/LSB) > Linux Standard Base requirements which mandated a package of name > "*xntp*" is installed in contrast to older software by name of "*ntp*".
Please provide a link to the LSB requirements which mandate this name change. If you can't you're spreading mis-information. > To be LSB compliant SuSE and others renamed the _current_ ntpd package, > associated scripts and stuff "*xntp*". Debian's NTP packages are LSB compliant and are not mis-named as xntp_blah. -- Steve Kostecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NTP Public Services Project - http://ntp.isc.org/ _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
