David, RFC 1305 was the seat of furious controversy. I consider the only authorative document is in PostScript, later in PDF. The IETF and I have engaged in serious disagreement on PDF formats as against Postel ASCII. Everything, and I mean everything today is in PDF - Governent documents and forms, University documents and forms, IEEE standards, ACM and IEEE publications and everything else I do is in PDF. So, what you see is what you get. The PDF of RFC 1305 is on the NTP project page.
Dave David J Taylor wrote: > Richard B. gilbert wrote: > >>David J Taylor wrote: > > [] > >>>From this, I would suggest: >>> >>>precision - degree of correctness >>> >>>resolution - accuracy of measurement >>> >>>Perhaps NTP has its own definitions? >> >>Indeed it does! See RFC-1305 page 11. > > > Thanks, but I don't see page numbers here: > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1305.html > > Nor can I quickly see the definitions... > > David > > _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
