Ry, You scratch a really contentious itch. The PDF report you found was my submission to the NTP working group, but it is not in Postel ASCII as required by the IETF. The Postel ASCII is the .txt format you found, but it has not been formated as Postel ASCII yet. BOth documents are intended to describe the same specification; however, the .txt document, which has been wordsmithed somewhat from the PDF, is probably the definitive document.
Dave Ry wrote: > On Feb 16, 8:20 am, "Ry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Is there still an effort to product an RFC for NTPv4 underway? Or do >>the SNTPv4 RFCs suffice for describing the protocol (leaving the core >>clock algorithms up to the implementation)? > > > Whoops... I wrote that too soon. I found it on your udel pages. > > This is the correct link, right? > http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/database/reports/ntp4/ntp4.pdf > > Or is it this one? > http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntpv4.txt > _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
