"wa6zvp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > matching cases in the switch. What was the value of up->type when > > it got to line 788? And up->state? > > * My recollection is that up->type actually had t_unknown in it, > making it even more puzzling. Don't remember state.
Hmm, I'm wondering if the fact that there's no "break" after the call to msyslog at line 784 could be significant? Surely not. > If I start ntpd with gdb, it just says 'normal completion', meanwhile > the forked process crashes. Is there a way to get gdb to follow into > the forked process? If not, I have to get it running without the data > and attach to the running process. This will have to wait till tonight. The -n option to ntpd will keep it in the foreground, not sure how you pass that to it from gdb, um gdb ntpd run -n maybe? -- Ronan Flood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
