David L. Mills wrote: > Martin, > > The descrete values used for the TTL is consistent with the > administrative scoping rules spelled out in the RFC cited in the > documentation. > > Dave
Dave, this is a case where the rules are totally wrong. TTL here is a HOP count and not a time-to-live, in spite of the label. In IPv6 it's really called a hop count rather than ttl but we should not propogate this error. I can't find anything either in the NTPv4 Draft RFC or RFC 1305 so I don't know what RFC you mean. Can you clarify? Multicast doesn't work the way that it was originally designed. It also make no sense to specify a value other than what you want the ttl be set to. Danny _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
