Steve Kostecke wrote:
> On 2007-03-06, David J Taylor wrote:
>
>> Noted this in my even log:
>>
>> Detected positive leap second announcement for 2007-04-01 00:00:00
>> UTC
>
> If you wish to see the leap variable for each of those servers:
>
> 1. 'ntpq -cas your_time_server' to get the list of association numbers
>
> 2. 'ntpq -c"rv Assn# leap" your_time_server' for each association
> number
>
> I used this "one-liner" (in bash) to check all of the ntpds on my LAN:
>
> for H in space_delimited_list_of_hostnames ; do for P in `ntpq -cas
> $H | \ awk 'OK==1 { print $2} /=/ { OK = 1 }'`; do echo -n "$H - $P:
> "; \
> ntpq -c"rv $P leap" $H | tail -n 1; done; done
>
> BTW: The USNO "When Does Daylight Time Begin and End?" is at
> http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/daylight_time.htmlThanks, Steve. I used a simpler script (fixed association numbers) and got this: ------------------------------------------------------------- C:\Tests>for /L %S IN (53081 1 53085) DO (ntpq -c"rv %S leap" ) C:\Tests>(ntpq -c"rv 53081 leap" ) assID=53081 status=9624 reach, conf, sel_sys.peer, 2 events, event_reach, leap=00 C:\Tests>(ntpq -c"rv 53082 leap" ) assID=53082 status=9424 reach, conf, sel_candidat, 2 events, event_reach, leap=00 C:\Tests>(ntpq -c"rv 53083 leap" ) assID=53083 status=9424 reach, conf, sel_candidat, 2 events, event_reach, leap=00 C:\Tests>(ntpq -c"rv 53084 leap" ) assID=53084 status=9424 reach, conf, sel_candidat, 2 events, event_reach, leap=00 C:\Tests>(ntpq -c"rv 53085 leap" ) assID=53085 status=9324 reach, conf, sel_outlyer, 2 events, event_reach, leap=00 C:\Tests> ------------------------------------------------------------- As these all show leap=00, does this mean that the errant server has now been corrected? How can I find out if my own ntp client will try to insert a leap second or not? ------------------------------------------------------------- C:\Tests>ntpq -c rv assID=0 status=0664 leap_none, sync_ntp, 6 events, event_peer/strat_chg, version="ntpd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dec 22 12:23:10 (UTC+01:00) 2005 (1)", processor="unknown", system="WINDOWS/NT", leap=00, stratum=2, precision=-23, rootdelay=1.335, rootdispersion=36.490, peer=53081, refid=192.168.0.3, reftime=c997fc41.b1374d63 Tue, Mar 6 2007 14:42:09.692, poll=8, clock=c998021e.08b0448a Tue, Mar 6 2007 15:07:10.033, state=4, offset=4.463, frequency=12.740, jitter=0.467, noise=1.086, stability=0.035, tai=0 ------------------------------------------------------------- Does leap_none look good? Thanks, David _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
