Thomas Tornblom wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) writes: > >> Thomas Tornblom wrote: >> If I understand correctly what you are asking what we need here instead >> of the server line, we should have a pool line and and an exclude line >> to ignore any specific IP addresses that we don't want to use. I'm >> suggesting that the exclude line can be used separately since you don't >> want them anywhere used. So for example you would want to do something >> like this: >> >> exclude 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> exclude 5.6.7.8 >> pool se.europe.pool.ntp.org max 5 >> > > No, what I'm asking for is that anyone that is participating the pool > initiative should be required to accept connections from any > reasonable client, and specifically not be allowed to filter out > traffic from a large ISP just because they acted as asses 20 years ago. >
That's really a subject for the pool mailing list rather than this one. I don't know how servers are added or removed from the pool but we have no say here on how it is done. > Having an "exclude" option is a band-aid solution to this problem. True, but I could make a case for something like this for other reasons, but that's not the issue here. Danny _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
