On 2007-03-23, Per Hedeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hm, I'm afraid my post came across the wrong way. Let me say that I > really enjoy your posts
Thank-you. > which I find to be consistently informed, informative, and > to-the-point wrt to the questions asked / problems reported That is my goal. My reply in this case was, unfortunately, a bit intemperate. > - hence what I really wanted to say above was: If you (by whatever > means) know for a fact that orphan mode requires broadcast, I'll take > your word for it I had only tested broadcast/multicast mode at the time of my reply and could only report that those modes worked. > but if not, and since you appear to have a test setup, maybe you could > try... (without wanting to "demand" that:-). > > Well that question seems to be moot per your other post - thanks a lot > for that! And I expect that it will be useful for the OP too, since his > setup wouldn't allow broadcast to work. Most types of associations (i.e. unicast client/server, unicast peer, broadcast, and unicast) worked in orphan mode. The only one the did not was Manycast. > The problem then is really that the "offical documentation" (hm, seems > it always takes me 5 minutes of random clicking to find what I'm looking > for there - an ntp.conf(5) page would be soo much simpler - but anyway > it's http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/manyopt.html) appears to > be self-contradictory. It certainly mislead me. > Oh, and I hope you put your orphan findings on the wiki somewhere - I plan to. > thanks again! You're quite welcome. -- Steve Kostecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NTP Public Services Project - http://ntp.isc.org/ _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
