Danny Mayer wrote: > Jan Ceuleers wrote: >> This means that there is no need to allocate memory for constructing the >> reply packet, no need to copy data from received to transmitted packet, etc. > > This is also false. That's not what the code does. The recvbuf structure > is not even the same size as the transmitbuf structure.
I wasn't talking about the recvbuf and transmitbuf structures, but the socket receive and transmit buffers. Besides, transmitbuf appears to only exist in the Windows port. Jan _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
