"Richard B. Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] > I can imagine an RTT of 60-70ms. What I have difficulty imagining is > using such a source to synch with.
Pfft. Kids these days. (There's nothing wrong with an RTT of 60 to 70 ms per se. For example, if it were always exactly 65 ms, that would probably be an *excellent* time source. The problem is the jitter, and as the example of the four possible paths along the two possible routes shows, even that can, under the right circumstances, be solved.) Groetjes, Maarten Wiltink _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
