On 2008-02-05, Richard B. Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If true, it's a poor idea. /usr and anything under it belongs to the > operating system.
That depends on your OS. > It's possible for an upgrade to replace /usr in its > entirity!! That depends on your OS and whether or not its software/package management system is broken as designed. >/opt is the preferred tree to install applications in. That depends on your OS. > This is not to say that /usr/local has not been used by many people, > only that it is far from being "best practice". I believe that the BSD world will disagree with you here. -- Steve Kostecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NTP Public Services Project - http://support.ntp.org/ _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
