Harlan, Here are sample of the debug output, which include IP addresses that start with 69. This first sample gave no reply. I assume it is version 3. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- MCAST *****sendpkt(fd=6 dst=192.70.172.132, src=132.246.168.2, ttl=0, len=48) transmit: at 37 132.246.168.2->192.70.172.132 mode 4 input_handler: if=2 fd=6 length 48 from d1cd2803 209.205.40.3 receive: at 38 132.246.168.2<-209.205.40.3 restrict 00 receive: at 38 132.246.168.2<-209.205.40.3 mode 3 code 2 MCAST *****sendpkt(fd=6 dst=209.205.40.3, src=132.246.168.2, ttl=0, len=48) transmit: at 38 132.246.168.2->209.205.40.3 mode 4 input_handler: if=2 fd=6 length 48 from 453fdb02 69.63.219.2 receive: at 38 132.246.168.2<-69.63.219.2 restrict 00 input_handler: if=2 fd=6 length 48 from d06f2383 208.111.35.131 receive: at 38 132.246.168.2<-208.111.35.131 restrict 00 receive: at 38 132.246.168.2<-208.111.35.131 mode 3 code 2 MCAST *****sendpkt(fd=6 dst=208.111.35.131, src=132.246.168.2, ttl=0, len=48) transmit: at 38 132.246.168.2->208.111.35.131 mode 4 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
This sample did reply in mode 4. ------------------------------------------------- receive: at 182 132.246.168.2<-72.139.76.245 mode 3 code 2 MCAST *****sendpkt(fd=6 dst=72.139.76.245, src=132.246.168.2, ttl=0, len=48) transmit: at 182 132.246.168.2->72.139.76.245 mode 4 input_handler: if=2 fd=6 length 48 from 459c69c0 69.156.105.192 receive: at 182 132.246.168.2<-69.156.105.192 restrict 00 receive: at 182 132.246.168.2<-69.156.105.192 mode 3 code 2 MCAST *****sendpkt(fd=6 dst=69.156.105.192, src=132.246.168.2, ttl=0, len=48) transmit: at 182 132.246.168.2->69.156.105.192 mode 4 input_handler: if=2 fd=6 length 48 from 0426649b 4.38.100.155 receive: at 183 132.246.168.2<-4.38.100.155 restrict 00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Does this make any sense to you? Thanks for your help, Ray ======================================== "Harlan Stenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ray, > > >>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ray> I am running stratum-1 servers with NTP version 4.1.0. There are no > Ray> restrictions in the NTP configuration and no restrictions in the > Ray> firewall. Yet, when I receive NTP request, from version3, and with an > Ray> IP address starting with 69, the daemon does not reply to it. The > Ray> server will reply to NTP packets with version4. The server appears to > Ray> respond properly to all other subnets. Does anyone have any ideas why > Ray> this happens? > > Got any debug output from ntpd that shows it receiving/replying v4 but > receiving/not replying to v3? > > -- > Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
