On 2008-04-02, David L. Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was afraid this might happen. There is no such port check in the > development branch, so somebody broke my rules not to change ntp_proto.c > withhout my permission. The result not only breaks the specification, it > disables symmetric active/active modes. Any check like this has to be > mode dependent, so whoever made the change eithher doesn't believe the > specification or doesn't understand symmetric modes or both. > > This is the main reason I object to changing the files I specifically > reserve for my own paws, including ntp_proto.c, ntp_crypto.c, > ntp_loopfilter.c and ntp-keygen.c, between development merges and I'm > rather pissed off.
I don't see 'NTP_PORT' in ntp_proto.c in the current stable release: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/ntp-4.2.4p4/ntpd$ grep NTP_PORT ntp_proto.c [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/ntp-4.2.4p4/ntpd$ -- Steve Kostecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NTP Public Services Project - http://support.ntp.org/ _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
