Martin Burnicki wrote: > Danny, > > Danny Mayer wrote: >> Ronan Flood wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) wrote: >>> >>>> 4.1.0 was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. >>> "The code is out there." >>> >> That doesn't matter. We only support the current current unless there's >> a paid contract to maintain some other version. Dave was concerned about >> something that he wants to ensure control of but that's in the recent >> versions. > > I don't think I've read a request where this should be fixed in an older > version. > > The problem in this NG seems to be that some insiders seem to assume all > users are running a very recent version of NTP, and I'm pretty sure this is > not the case. > > I think most users run the version which comes with their OS or > distribution, and stuck with it unless they stumble across a bug or > limitation, in which case it's normally sufficient to point them to the > latest version. > > Martin
I understand all this. However, with such an old version it's almost impossible to figure out what's wrong. In most cases where something used to work and is no longer working, it's environmental changes or configuration changes. Someone who says that 69/8 addresses don't work must have a configuration/environmental issue rather than a code issue but without finding the old source code, searching, building and deploying it, how is anyone going to know what's wrong? Danny _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
