[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal Murray) writes:
>>OK, so there was no magic in that 500PPM limit. Is there a difference >>between the tick size adjustment and the frequency adjustment >>(CPU-counter-to-time conversion factor). >Limiting the slew rate to something like that means that >software that is timing things with code like: > grab time, do something, grab time, subtract >gets a sane answer if it happens to be running while somebody >adjusts the time. Do you know any code that cares if that is wrong by 10% (which would be 100000PPM) Ie, is 10% error insane? Is 1% (10000PPM)? Ie, .05% seems a bit extreme for that. >-- >These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
