Gene, I've seen and reviewed the paper; however, reviews are private to the authors. Someone else should take a close look at what they are actually measuring and assess the dynmaics of the discipline loop.
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Developers at the University of Melbourne have produced a time-sync > client called "TSCclock" which exchanges standard NTP packets with a > NTP server. They assert that TSCclock, which runs on FreeBSD and at > least two flavors of Linux (Ubuntu and Fedora), provides substantially > better synchronization than ntpd both on a LAN and over the Internet. > > The following info is some of what is available: > > 1. The TSCclock page at the University of Melbourne: > http://www.cubinlab.ee.unimelb.edu.au/tscclock/ > > 2. A paper titled "Ten Microseconds Over LAN, for Free", originally > presented at the 2007 International IEEE Symposium on Precision Clock > Synchronization for Measurement, Control and Communication. This is > available at > http://www.cubinlab.ee.unimelb.edu.au/~darryl/Publications/ISPCS07_camera.pdf > It includes a general description of their approach and results for > both ntpd and TSCclock obtained in their testbed. > > 3. A one-hour Google Tech Talk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3nXgeh7v_U > > All of the info on TSCclock that I have run across has originated with > the group at the University of Melbourne. Does anyone know of an > independent comparison between ntpd and TSCclock? > > Thanks, > Gene _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
