Sorry, I accidentally hit send too soon during the middle of an edit. Damn you Gmail, and your odd keyboard shortcuts! My second paragraph should have read:
"Now the lack of support for broadcast and multicast modes may be grounds for calling the implementation non-compliant, but the RFC is a bit unclear as to whether all modes of operation are required. The use of the standard RFC 2119 language (MUST, SHOULD, MAY, MUST NOT, etc.) was obviously not possible as RFC 1305 pre-dates that RFC by many years. Does the NTPv4 draft remedy this and use RFC 2119-style language?" Regards, -- RPM _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
