Unruh schrieb:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nicola Berndt) writes:
> 
>>>>      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  
>>>> jitter
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>  GPS_NMEA(0)     .GPS.            0 l    9   64   37    0.000  -580.75 
>>>> 3965.19
>>> You've not had your first 8 samples yet.  You haven't actually had 
>>> enough for ntpd to act on the data.  You can speed that up with iburst, 
>>> but ntpd will still take a long time to get a very tight lock.  jitter 
>>> will reduce as you get to the eight samples.  The good? think, is that 
>>> you are more than 128ms out, so that ntpd will step the time, to zero 
>>> the offset, once it gets enough samples.
> 
> 
>> Just tried the iburst option, but I had to figure it only works with the 
>> server command, not on refclocks.
> 
> Oops forgot you have a gps clock. chrony does not work with refclocks.
> 
> 
>> What really puzzles me, is the stoical 600 ms offset after rebooting. 
>> Since it is always returning having more or less the same amount, I 
>> should really be able to get rid of it, no?
> 
> It sounds like your rtc has problems. You can use hwclock to compensate for
> rtc problems. 

Well, I tried 'hwclock --systohc' with no different result. More 
suggestions?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

tel: +49 30 / 6730 1395
fax: +49 30 / 6730 1394
gsm: +49 163 / 243 6802
________________________________
_______________________________________________
questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Reply via email to