In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Peter J. Cherny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joseph Gwinn wrote: > > I will file an enhancement request. However, my feeling is that this > > function would be most useful if added to ntpq, and yielded the full > > filename including directories, as there may be multiple "ntp.conf" > > files scattered about. The key is to get NTP to tell us which file NTP > > is using, without interference from our firmly held but sadly mistaken > > assumptions about what NTP ought to be doing. > > And you'll file enhancement requests for every other daemon > on the machine ??? Only the ones that sufficiently annoy me. > In most OSs the man pages are definitive and mostly correct, > with changes noted in the release notes. > If you've paid your support fees, ask the vendor. > In most of the Unix family, the source is available. A support question is being placed with IBM. But newsgroups often think of angles that support does not. > <flame> > Else, ask a SysAdmin/SysEngineer/SwEngineer who does this for a living. > You do have other than junior staff ? > </flame> Umm. I'm not a sysadmin. If we had such a person, I wouldn't be doing the debugging. Few people even know that NTP exists, let alone how it works well enough to debug an installation. When there is a time problem, the sysadmins come and grab me to help them. So far, I've always been able to figure the problem out. Joe Gwinn _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
