[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal Murray) writes:
>>There is nothing per se that makes this system impossible to deliver 1ms. >>Of course it depends of where those clients are-- if they are at the bottom >>of the sea communicating with 1bd/sec ultralow frequency radio, you will >>not get 1ms precision. >What's wrong with a (very) slow link? As long as there aren't any >queueing delays, the delay should be symmetric in both directions >and I'd expect ntpd to work OK. And I would expect a many second difference in the delay times in the two directions. If nthing else but slightly different message lengths. >Does 1 bd/sec overflow some of ntpd's assumptions? Would it need >some minpoll tweaking? >Or maybe I should ask: How slow a link is still useful? >-- >These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
