Micky wrote: > On Sep 30, 4:38 pm, David Woolley >> I thought there was only pseudo code in RFC 1305, not C code. >> > > It has both.
As far as I can tell, the C is in a non-normative appendix, and is probably just an extract of an early version of the V3 reference implementation, which has been thrown in to help clarify the formal part of the specification. If you want the formal definition of the algorithms, you need to use the pseudo-code. If you want a self contained C code implementation, you need to look at the reference implementation. I must admit I had never noticed the C before, as it a long way from the important parts of the document. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
