"David J Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Unruh wrote: >[] >> This is a design decision. And David will defend this "slow >> convergence" "to the death". chrony is much faster, but does not do >> refclocks at all so that is a useless option here.
>chrony is also useless on Windows. >David Agreed. It is AFAIK only useful on Linux. It is an example however of a system which has faster response than ntp, and has better clock control than ntp, without, afaik sacrificing stability or anything else. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
